Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Leyland History
#5
I feel it`s the right thing to do in posting my friends reply in full, as he obviously took some time in preparing it.
It is also in line with the comments made by William and Frank.

Jim:

No ship rescued passengers form the "sinking" Titanic. If the California, which was with-in 10 miles of the foundering vessels had come to her aid, we would probably have never heard of Titanic other in brief passing. The ship which did come to the aid of the survivors was the Carpathia, which was owned by Cunard Lines, which later merged with White Star and now owns the QE II and the Queen Mary II. The Cunard Line was begun by Samuel Cunard in 1840 as the North American Royal Mail Steam Packet Company, though always known as the Cunard Line.

Now, the Californian, which watched the Titanic founder and did nothing to assist her, was owned by the Leyland Line and was captained by Stanley Lord. The Leyland line was founded by Frederick Leyland in 1873. He died in 1892 and the company was restructured and named Frederick Leyland & Co Ltd and had a close relationship with Furness Lines. By 1895 the two had merged and by 1896 was bought out again and became Wilson's & Furness-Leyland Line and North Atlantic passenger service mainly concentrating on the immigrant trade started. In 1902 the company came under the control of International Mercantile Marine Co which also had control of American Line, Dominion, Red Star, Atlantic Transport and White Star Line, the owners of the Titanic. While His Grace Lord Pirie still held shares in White Star Line, the primary share holder of International Mercantile Marine was New York Financier, industrialist and investor J.P. Morgan who was actually scheduled to sail on Titanic maiden voyage but cancelled his trip at the last minute. His suite then went to White Star Chairman J. Bruce Ismay the with Lady Cardoza occupying the other "Millionaire Suite." Interestingly it was her Ladyship's suite that was photographed by Cameron for his movie Titanic as being Caledon Hockley's suite.

So, in conclusion, if a town were named after the owner of the California, I would say it would be Morganville, New Jersey USA, not Leyland, Lancs, UK. As far as Leyland goes, it is mentioned in the Domesday Book which dates back to the 12th century, so I seriously doubt any ancestor of this posted was the person for whom the village was named. A Ley is a grassland or pasture and Leyland was most likely named for the surrounding pasturelands. It can also mean a path or trail. My guess is, since your area of Lancs was primarily agrarian at the time, it was probably named for the pasturelands used for sheep herding.

Hope this helps you Jim,
Jim
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Leyland History - by Martin - 09-May-2004, 03:38 PM
[No subject] - by Spitfire - 09-May-2004, 05:11 PM
[No subject] - by anacortesdamp - 10-May-2004, 02:03 AM
[No subject] - by William R - 10-May-2004, 11:01 AM
[No subject] - by Spitfire - 10-May-2004, 03:02 PM
[No subject] - by Guest 01 - 10-May-2004, 03:49 PM
[No subject] - by Martin - 10-May-2004, 09:23 PM
[No subject] - by David - 11-May-2004, 12:58 AM
[No subject] - by noel - 11-May-2004, 07:35 PM
[No subject] - by anacortesdamp - 12-May-2004, 12:29 AM
[No subject] - by David - 12-May-2004, 04:05 AM
[No subject] - by anacortesdamp - 12-May-2004, 05:18 AM
[No subject] - by William R - 12-May-2004, 12:46 PM
[No subject] - by David - 13-May-2004, 02:46 PM
[No subject] - by SherbornLeland - 04-Mar-2005, 05:00 PM
[No subject] - by Spitfire - 04-Mar-2005, 07:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)